Methodology

How every RuleboardAI report is produced

A report you can't interrogate is just an opinion. This page publishes the standards behind RuleboardAI deliverables — what the scores mean, how evidence moves them, and where their limits are — so buyers can evaluate the method, not just the output.

Public-source first

Preliminary work uses public evidence only — filings, registers, enforcement records. Deeper review requires your written authorization.

Evidence before conclusions

Six evidence states and four finding labels keep every conclusion no stronger than its evidence. Gaps are reported, never guessed.

Human review at the gates

Classification, findings, escalations, and monitoring updates are each reviewed by a person before anything reaches you.

RCPS Methodology & Scoring Standards

Version 1.0 · Effective July 21, 2026

The full published standard: seven classification axes, seven maturity axes on a defined 1–5 scale, the workflow-scoping logic, composite-score treatment, evidence states, human-review points, version governance, and — conspicuously — what the methodology cannot conclude.

Publicly ObservableClient-ProvidedVerifiedPartially VerifiedUnresolvedNot Applicable
Read the RCPS standard

Request a Methodology Walkthrough

A working session on how RCPS scoring and evidence states apply to your institution.

Company status

By submitting you consent to us contacting you about this request. Handled per our Privacy Policy and Trust Center.